Smart Peer Review Assistant

Manuscript Title / ID

Journal

Recommendation

📊 Evaluation Rubric (1-5)

Originality

Methodology

Clarity

Relevance

✅ Reviewer's Checklist (Click to expand)

Is the research question clearly defined? Is the methodology appropriate and sound? Are the references relevant and up-to-date? Do the conclusions logically follow from the data? Is the language and academic tone adequate?

💡

Constructive Tone Check: You used the word "terrible". Consider using more constructive phrasing like "needs improvement" or "lacks clarity" to maintain a professional academic tone.

0 words

📝 Peer Review Assistant

📊 Evaluation Rubric (1-5)

📚 Academic Phrasebank